Tartary divided between the Romanovs and the United States, the former claiming Siberia and the latter, half of the North American continent. The naissance of the USA in 1776. 
2.7. The formation of the United States in 1776 and the annexation of the American territories of the Muscovite Tartary
Let us recollect just how and when the United States of America were founded. The Encyclopaedic Dictionary tells us about “the independent state, or the USA, founded in 1776, during the North American War for Independence of 1775-1783” ([797], page 1232). We suddenly realise that the foundation of the USA strangely coincides with the end of the war against “Pougachev” in Russia (he was defeated in 1775, q.v. above). This arranges everything in a different perspective – the “War for Independence” in North America had been the war against the last American remnants of the Russian Horde, which had been attacked by the Romanovs from the West, and by the American “freedom fighters” in the East. Nowadays we are being told that the Americans had struggled for independence from their British colonial governors. In reality, it had been a war for the vast lands of Muscovite Tartary left without a governor. The American troops hurried to the West and the Northwest so as not to be late for their share of the land. It is common knowledge that George Washington became the first President of the USA in 1776 ([797], page 1232). It turns out that Washington became the first ruler of the American territory that had formerly belonged to the Russian Horde. It is understandable that the very fact that there had been a war against the “Mongolian” Horde in America had been erased from the American history textbooks, likewise the very existence of the tremendous Muscovite Tartary. The war between the United States and the remnants of the Horde for the entirety of the American continent had continued until the second half of the XIX century. Alaska had remained in Russian possession for a particularly long period of time, and so it was “purchased” from the Romanovs in 1867 for a token price ([797], page 1232). The above means that the United States of America were founded spontaneously in 1776, comprising the American fragment of the Great = “Mongolian” Empire – namely, the American part of Muscovite Tartary. This circumstance was never recorded in any history textbook – the topic must have been tabooed initially, and then forgotten altogether. “Independence from British rule” became the official version.



The Da Vinci code broken for good
Unnerving as the idea might seem, popular fiction dealing with conspiracies of one sort or another is actually quite tame as compared to reality. The Roman Catholic Church, for instance, is involved in a much greater hoax than the most daring writer could possibly conceive of – one that deals with the very foundations of history itself.  The above statement is neither an exaggeration, nor a metaphor. Very few people are aware that the B.C./A.D. chronology as we know it was created by a handful of Jesuits in the XVI-XVII century – Joseph Scaliger, Dionysius Petavius, and their successors.  We have grown so accustomed to a timeline that runs through many millennia, from the Egyptian pyramids to the present day, that the mere thought of questioning its veracity seems perfectly preposterous – just like the notion of a rotating earth must have seemed in the epoch of Galileo Galilei, and just as heretical.  But nevertheless, the entire conception of ancient and mediaeval history known to us today owes its existence to a XVI century Jesuit hoax. A hoax that has finally been exposed with the aid of astronomy, mathematical statistics and modern computational facilities.

Fomenko-The Issue With Antiquity Book 5 History: Fiction or Science? page 6  -From the publisher, Hideous inconsistencies of history


6) The Biblical Israel.
First we have the Roman (aka “Byzantine”) Empire of the XII-XIII century with its capital in New Rome on the Bosporus, also known as Jerusalem and Troy. Then, between the XIV and the XVII century, it pertains to the Great = “Mongolian” Empire with its capital in Novgorod the Great = Yaroslavl.

7). Biblical Judea, “Ancient” Rome and “Ancient” Greece.  The places in question can all be identified as Asia Minor and the Balkans with a capital in Czar-Grad on the Bosporus. Other names of the capital are Jerusalem, Constantinople and Troy. The name Judea was primarily used in ecclesiastical sources – other names of Judea in mediaeval sources are Greece and Romea. Its Balkan part was known as Rumelia up until the XX century. Nowadays we use the arbitrary term “Byzantium” for referring to this territory as it had been in the Middle Ages.  The “ancient” Western European sources (whose contemporary editions all date from the XVI-XVII century) describe Romea (Judea, or “Byzantium”) as the “ancient Greece”. Apart from that, the “ancient” authors used the term “Israel” for referring to Russia, or the Horde, in the XV-XVII century, while the Ottoman = Ataman Empire was known as Judea.

-Anatoly Fomenko, 16-Crusades and Exoduses -History-Fiction or Science Book 16-.pdf, page 49


Brutus has to fight against Gog and Magog during the conquest of Britain (aka the Tartars and Mongols or the Ten Tribes of Israel)  
Anatoly Fomenko, page 101, 
15-The Issue with Great Britain -History-Fiction or Science Book 15-.pdf
"Who does Brutus encounter here? Giants, no less – apparently, a reference to the various nations that populated the territory of Byzantium and Russia (the Horde): “One of these giants was particularly repulsive; his name was Goemagog”. According to Galfridus, this giant was exceptionally strong and fearsome. The army of Brutus attacked the twelve giants with Goemagog among them. The Brits are pushed back initially, but finally “crush the giants completely, save for Goemagog”. The battle against Goemagog continues, and finally the Brits manage to defeat him as well."

page 105, "In Chron6 we demonstrate that the Great = “Mongolian” Conquest of the XIV century and the Ottoman = Ataman conquest of the XV-XVI century that had followed it was described in the Bible as the conquest of the “Promised Land” by the tribes of Israel. Apparently, the very fact that the Tartars and the Mongols, or Gog and Magog, were identified as the tribes of Israel is referred to directly in the ancient chronicles; old maps also make it perfectly obvious ([953]).  Historians report the following: “The invasion of the Mongols and the Tartars was considered to be an ‘omen’ of the imminent Apocalypse, and many have identified those nations as Gog and Magog, including Matthew of Paris

"Matthew writes about the Tartars and the Mongols who suddenly swarmed Europe from behind their mountains. He traces the lineage of the Tartars to the ten tribes of Israel pushed behind the mountains by Alexander of Macedon, thus fusing several myths into one, likewise Peter Camestor and other scientists – the myth of Gog and Magog as well as the one of the Ten Tribes”

"Let us also consider the ancient mediaeval map of the alleged XIII century as cited in [953], page 181 (number XIV.2.1, Cambridge, CCC, 26). The following is written there: “Closed-off area beyond the Caspian mountains. Here be the Jews that the Lord saved us from after the prayer of King Alexander; they shall come before the Judgement Day as the Lord’s scourge, and they shall herald the demise of all the other nations”

"There is another ancient map with a similar inscription: “The Lord hath heard the prayer of King Alexander, and made the Jews dwell behind these mountains in reclusion. They shall break free before the Judgement Day and wipe out every nation to comply with the will of the Lord."

10.5. The forgotten meaning of the Church Slavonic word for (“Yevrey”)
First of all, let us briefly formulate our primary hypothesis, giving a list of the four possible originals. The first original: the epoch of Christ, or the XII century. This may be the very epoch of the First Crusade (allegedly the end of the XI century) = Fourth Crusade (the beginning of the XIII century), and also the epoch of the ancient Empire, which was the predecessor of the Great = "Mongolian" Empire, whose imperial dynasty had later ruled as the Czars of the Russian Great (“Mongolian”) Empire of the XIV-XVI century. These monarchs must have indeed traced their lineage all the way up to Jesus Christ, or at least considered themselves to be his kin. The royal dynasty of the Great Empire perished during the Great Strife and the dissolution of the Empire in the XVII century. The XI century is the oldest epoch in the documented history of humankind, and the entire volume of information pertaining thereto available to us today is very meagre indeed.


The Apocalypse predicts Judgement Day masking the prediction with astronomical symbolism. However, it is possible that this symbolism was obscured in the subsequent editions of the XVI-XVII century. An astronomical horoscope is encrypted in the Apocalypse, and provides for the possibility of dating it. The date of the horoscope is 1 October 1486, which ideally corresponds to the expected mediaeval date of the Judgement Day in 1492.  The Apocalypse was most likely written at the end of the XV century A.D., several years before what the entire mediaeval Christian world perceived as the impending Judgement Day in the year 7,000 since Adam, or 1492 A.D.  Mortal fear of this event is vividly reflected in the Apocalypse.      03-The Apocalypse as seen by Astronomy -History-Fiction or Science Book 3-.pdf    -page 73

08-The Horde from Pacific to Atlantic -History-Fiction or Science Book 8-.pdf    p.44

If we open Kostomarov’s Bogdan Khmelnitskiy ([437]), we shall see that the Cossacks had fought alongside the Tartars, and the Tartars exclusively, since the latter are mentioned throughout the book as the allies of the former, the two being parts of the same army. Furthermore, the Cossacks and the Tartars were present in the Polish troops as well; one is under the impression that the entire Ukraine was filled with the Tartars in the middle of the XVII century. According to our hypothesis, the Tartars were the Cossacks that came from the South of Russia and elsewhere to aid their brethren from Zaporozhye.

Addendum 1.
What happened to the treasury of the Great = “Mongolian” Empire after the great divide of the XVII century.

It has to be pointed out that all the famous diamonds mentioned above were associated with “India” in one way or another, or the Horde (Russia) of the XIV-XVI century, as we are beginning to realise. Russia was also formerly known as India, qv in CHRON5, Chapter 8:6.6. It was the name used by foreigners for referring to Russia. As we learn from the historians themselves, all such “Indian gems” fell into the hands of the Romanovs and the Reformist rulers of the Western Europe in the XVII century, which is the very epoch of the Strife and the fragmentation of the Horde. Romanovian history doesn’t even make any secret of the fact that the treasures in question were captured in the wars fought on the territory of “India” and “Persia” in the “orient”. Everything is correct – the Romanovs, the West European rulers and the USA were dividing the legacy of Russia, or the Horde, between them, including one of the richest treasuries in the world...

Which party is correct? As we realise today, the “ancient” authors described everything accurately and wrote their works in the epoch of the XV-XVII century. Moreover, Russia, or the Horde, was known as “India” in the West (the word derives from the Russian word “inde”, which translates as “far away”. Historians are unanimous about the legendary mediaeval India being exceptionally rich in gold and diamonds. Historians and geologists report the following: “The largest and most famous stones, such as Koh-i-Noor, Regent, Orlov, Derianoor, Sanci, Shah, Hope, Florentine, Dresden Green etc come from the Indian mines” ([430:1], page 73).


(chronologia.org changed to chronologia.net some time back)

ADDENDUM 2.   http://chronologia.net/en/seven5/index.html

The Biblical Book of Revelation refers to the Ottoman = Ataman Conquest of the XV-XVI century.

1. A brief rendition of the Apocalypse.

2. The warlord Joshua son of Nun as the “second coming” of Jesus Christ in the XV-XVI century.

3. The Great Apocalyptic Judgement as the invasion of the Ottomans = Atamans to the Western Europe in the XV-XVI century.

4. The Apocalyptic division of nations into “pure” and “impure”, the righteous and the sinners and so on as a reflection of the “quarantine massacre” of epidemic areas of Europe and the Mediterranean region by the Ottomans = Atamans.

5. Obvious traces of editing or even radical rewriting inherent in the Book of Revelation.

6. A possible reference to Noah = Columbus and his voyage towards the New World in 1492 made by the author of the Revelation.

7. Expectations of Doomsday in 1492 coincided with the departure of Noah’s (Columbus’s) fleet and the epoch of the Biblical Apocalypse.

8. The canonization of the Book of Revelation as a memento of the Ottoman = Ataman conquest for future generations.



'Song of the Defeat of Judean Khazaria' by Svyatoslav the Brave in 1847
Fomenko History: Fiction Or Science? Chron5, page 364   http://chronologia.net/en/seven5/index.html

PDF-  http://chronologia.net/counter/counter.php?book=25


“History is a pack of lies about events that never happened told by people who weren’t there.”    – George Santayana, American philosopher (1863-1952)