THE TWELVE PRESUMPTIONS OF COURT
Canon 3228
A Roman Court does not operate according to any true rule of law, but by presumptions of the law. Therefore, if
presumptions presented by the private Bar Guild are not rebutted they become fact and are therefore said to stand
true. There are twelve (12) key presumptions asserted by the private Bar Guilds which if unchallenged stand true
being Public Record, Public Service, Public Oath, Immunity, Summons, Custody, Court of Guardians, Court of
Trustees, Government as Executor/Beneficiary, Executor De Son Tort, Incompetence, and Guilt:
i. The Presumption of Public Record is that any matter brought before a lower Roman Courts is a matter
for the public record when in fact it is presumed by the members of the private Bar Guild that the matter
is a private Bar Guild business matter. Unless openly rebuked and rejected by stating clearly the matter is
to be on the Public Record, the matter remains a private Bar Guild matter completely under private Bar
Guild rules; and
ii. The Presumption of Public Service is that all the members of the Private Bar Guild who have all sworn
a solemn secret absolute oath to their Guild then act as public agents of the Government, or “public
officials” by making additional oaths of public office that openly and deliberately contradict their private
"superior" oaths to their own Guild. Unless openly rebuked and rejected, the claim stands that these
private Bar Guild members are legitimate public servants and therefore trustees under public oath; and
iii. The Presumption of Public Oath is that all members of the Private Bar Guild acting in the capacity of
"public officials" who have sworn a solemn public oath remain bound by that oath and therefore bound to
serve honestly, impartiality and fairly as dictated by their oath. Unless openly challenged and demanded,
the presumption stands that the Private Bar Guild members have functioned under their public oath in
contradiction to their Guild oath. If challenged, such individuals must recuse themselves as having a
conflict of interest and cannot possibly stand under a public oath; and
iv. The Presumption of Immunity is that key members of the Private Bar Guild in the capacity of "public
officials" acting as judges, prosecutors and magistrates who have sworn a solemn public oath in good
faith are immune from personal claims of injury and liability. Unless openly challenged and their oath
demanded, the presumption stands that the members of the Private Bar Guild as public trustees acting as
judges, prosecutors and magistrates are immune from any personal accountability for their actions; and
v. The Presumption of Summons is that by custom a summons unrebutted stands and therefore one who
attends Court is presumed to accept a position (defendant, juror, witness) and jurisdiction of the court.
Attendance to court is usually invitation by summons. Unless the summons is rejected and returned, with
a copy of the rejection filed prior to choosing to visit or attend, jurisdiction and position as the accused
and the existence of "guilt" stands; and
vi. The Presumption of Custody is that by custom a summons or warrant for arrest unrebutted stands and
therefore one who attends Court is presumed to be a thing and therefore liable to be detained in custody
by "Custodians". Custodians may only lawfully hold custody of property and "things" not flesh and blood
soul possessing beings. Unless this presumption is openly challenged by rejection of summons and/or at
court, the presumption stands you are a thing and property and therefore lawfully able to be kept in
custody by custodians; and
vii. The Presumption of Court of Guardians is the presumption that as you may be listed as a "resident" of
a ward of a local government area and have listed on your "passport" the letter P, you are a pauper and
therefore under the "Guardian" powers of the government and its agents as a "Court of Guardians".
Unless this presumption is openly challenged to demonstrate you are both a general guardian and general
executor of the matter (trust) before the court, the presumption stands and you are by default a pauper,
and lunatic and therefore must obey the rules of the clerk of guardians (clerk of magistrates court);
48
viii. The Presumption of Court of Trustees is that members of the Private Bar Guild presume you accept the
office of trustee as a "public servant" and "government employee" just by attending a Roman Court, as
such Courts are always for public trustees by the rules of the Guild and the Roman System. Unless this
presumption is openly challenged to state you are merely visiting by "invitation" to clear up the matter
and you are not a government employee or public trustee in this instance, the presumption stands and is
assumed as one of the most significant reasons to claim jurisdiction - simply because you "appeared"; and
ix. The Presumption of Government acting in two roles as Executor and Beneficiary is that for the
matter at hand, the Private Bar Guild appoint the judge/magistrate in the capacity of Executor while the
Prosecutor acts in the capacity of Beneficiary of the trust for the current matter. Unless this presumption
is openly challenged to demonstrate you are both a general guardian and general executor of the matter
(trust) before the court, the presumption stands and you are by default the trustee, therefore must obey the
rules of the executor (judge/magistrate); and
x. The Presumption of Executor De Son Tort is the presumption that if the accused does seek to assert
their right as Executor and Beneficiary over their body, mind and soul they are acting as an Executor De
Son Tort or a "false executor" challenging the "rightful" judge as Executor. Therefore, the
judge/magistrate assumes the role of "true" executor and has the right to have you arrested, detained,
fined or forced into a psychiatric evaluation. Unless this presumption is openly challenged by not only
asserting one's position as Executor as well as questioning if the judge or magistrate is seeking to act as
Executor De Son Tort, the presumption stands and a judge or magistrate of the private Bar guild may seek
to assistance of bailiffs or sheriffs to assert their false claim; and
xi. The Presumption of Incompetence is the presumption that you are at least ignorant of the law, therefore
incompetent to present yourself and argue properly. Therefore, the judge/magistrate as executor has the
right to have you arrested, detained, fined or forced into a psychiatric evaluation. Unless this presumption
is openly challenged to the fact that you know your position as executor and beneficiary and actively
rebuke and object to any contrary presumptions, then it stands by the time of pleading that you are
incompetent then the judge or magistrate can do what they need to keep you obedient; and
xii. The Presumption of Guilt is the presumption that as it is presumed to be a private business meeting of
the Bar Guild, you are guilty whether you plead "guilty", do not plead or plead "not guilty". Therefore
unless you either have previously prepared an affidavit of truth and motion to dismiss with extreme
prejudice onto the public record or call a demurrer, then the presumption is you are guilty and the private
Bar Guild can hold you until a bond is prepared to guarantee the amount the guild wants to profit from
you.